Back in the Game

•February 13, 2009 • 2 Comments

I have officially returned from a much needed blog hiatus. For those of you keeping score, the last four months have been quite eventful and include, but are not limited to, the following events:

Extricating my (professional) self from the animal sanctuary

Extricating my (whole) self from the state of New York

Returning home to Seattle to forge an illegitimate living from the depths of my dad’s basement

Receiving a letter of acceptance to Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan to study Urban Planning.

And an embarassing number of trips to once-frequented vegan restaurants.

I think that about covers it. Please look forward to future posts containing actually relevant material.

xoxo,
Weekends

Why I Didn’t Vote

•November 4, 2008 • 2 Comments

Dear Barack Obama,

I didn’t vote for you today. I didn’t vote for John McCain. I didn’t vote for anyone. Well, that’s not entirely true, I exercised my right not to vote. It’s not because I’m a bitter, disenfranchised person who couldn’t be bothered. It’s because I failed to believe that anyone running for president of the most powerful country in the world, could really, believable, stand for change.

Mr. Obama, you have centered your campaign around the working class people of America. You have sworn to protect jobs. What you have failed to mention are all the jobs that do not deserve to be protected. I don’t want someone who protects the right of the auto industry worker. I want someone who says that we will not produce another automobile unless it is 100% petroleum free and made of materials that do not come from under the feet of poor indegenous people in countries most Americans can’t find on a map (America is not really known for its raw steel production, you know?).

I don’t want someone to protect loggers and fishermen. I want someone who says that logging and fishing are destructive and archaic practices which are choking the planet to death and do not deserve our creedence any longer. I don’t want someone to talk about “sustainable development” I want someone who recognizes that there is nothing “sustainable” about increasing development on this finite planet. I want you to say that we must not tear down old buildings just to build new ones in the name of “progress”. I want you to say that the infiltration of suburban life and theory is destroying us as people and members of a communal species.

I want someone who says you cannot take without giving. I want someone who recognizes that a field of homogenous evergreen trees is not the same as a raw forest. I want someone who knows that money is not the equivalent of clean water. The idea that we make corporations pay for pollution in dollars is similar to accepting murder and rape so long as the offenders apologize for each action.

I don’t want someone to protect capitalism. I want someone who recognizes that the basic tenets of capitalism are fundamentally flawed. I want someone who understands that our current economic paradigm is dependent on the idea of unmitigated growth – a premise which is inherently unsustainable. I want someone who recognizes that corporations are dangerous and destructive entities which need to be entirely dismantled if we are to see a change in some of our biggest problems. I want you to say that an entity whose sole purpose is to make money above all else, has been an exclusively corrosive influence on our lives.

Mr. Obama, I want someone who recognizes that the destruction of our planet, the unprecedented commodification of humans, animals, and the earth is leading to our demise, and that the answer does not lie in industry. We cannot innovate our way out of the problems we have created by objectifying and exploiting the resources on which we depend. And we cannot continue our current rate of growth and consumption without exploitation. The answer will lie in a complete change of paradigm, not in a new lightbulb, not in an energy credit, but in a complete change in the way we view “necessity” “product” and “consumption”.

I want someone who fundamentally understands that water does not come from a faucet, that food does not come from a grocery store, and that power does not come from an outlet. Only after you have realized that it is our objectification of the natural world that is killing us, can you begin to think about what change looks like.

I want you to recognize the heirarchy that exists and work on abolishing it. In this heirarchy, the wealthy exist at the top and the poor at the bottom. When violence flows down the heirarchy it is called “collateral damage” “wage labor” and “defense”. When violence flows up the heirarchy, it is called “violence” and “terrorism”. I want you not to pay lip service to equality, but to truly live it. If you continue to protect human interests in exploiting each other and the natural world by encouraging global systems of economics and consumption, you cannot truly understand injustice.

I realize that one of the issues at stake in this particular election is my right to control my own reproductive system. What you don’t seem to understand is how horrifying it is that a group of people was ever given the power to take what should be a fundamental reality like breathing, and turn it into a “right” which could be either granted or taken depending on the political climate. I don’t want someone who says he will protect my right to choose, I want someone who says that this is not an issue to be debated. I want it to be taken off the table. I want you to say you will not participate in a system which put that issue on the table in the first place.

I don’t want someone who claims to love their dog but has done nothing to stop the slaughter of animals whose emotional richness and personal integrity are no different from our own, and who deserve our protection. I don’t want someone to look at animal testing (one of the great failures of modern medicine) and see progress. I want you to stand up and say that we are smart enough to create alternatives, and not back down until the industry has changed. I want someone to look at all living creatures as sentient beings who deserve respect, comfort, and reverence. They are not mere products that can be bandied about in the marketplace. They are the subject of a life, just as we all are.

To be clear, I don’t expect that the world will revert to a system of villages and communities (despite living nearly all of our history in such a way), but at the very least, I don’t want it to be made impossible for other people to do so. I want someone who protects the choice to abstain from participating in a political system as much as they protect the right for that system to exist.

What I want is the recognition that voting is not a personal tool, but a blindfold which is made to grant a false sense of power and responsibility to people who have been fundamentally stripped of their true voice. I don’t want to vote, I want a system which acknowledges that we should not have to ask for certain rights and protections. I want you to change the people that our current society has forced us to become. I want you to remove exploitation, heirarchy and privelege in all areas of our lives.

The American people have been stripped of their voice. The voice that says it is absurd to have to pay money just to exist on the planet. The voice that wonders why it is illigal to live on the earth without purchasing the spot on which you stand. The voice that says “I don’t want to sell myself to a company just to make money to live” The voice that says ”My time here is priceless and is not for sale” I want you to protect our birth given right to live without these civilizational crutches instead of burdening us with more responsibility. Responsibility disguised as duty and patriotism and honor, but really only serve to remove us from our true selves as members of a species who live on the earth and need nothing but the freedom to live, in order to survive and prosper. I don’t want you to speak for me. I want my voice back.

70lb Party

•October 27, 2008 • 2 Comments

This huge bundle of joy was dumped at the Sanctuary early last week. He showed up without a collar, totally abandoned. Despite the stigmas attached to his breed, he is extremely friendly, very eager to please, and probably wants to make out with you.

From some of the behaviors he is exhibiting, it’s pretty clear that he lived his entire life in an outdoor pen. He is very responsive to verbal reprimand so he must have received some discipline from his former owners. However, it’s pretty clear that he’s never been in a car before, and possibly never inside a house. He looks to be about 1.5-2 years old. He’s still growing which means he’s still eligible for a lifetime of good behavior.

He’s undergoing neuter surgery on Thursday. His vet says that a lot of his behaviors will settle down after the surgery.

He’s completely non-aggressive and very, very, very sweet. He spends most of his day lying down next to my desk. In case you couldn’t tell where I was going with this, we’re looking for someone to adopt him. Someone without other pets who wants to take him to obedience classes and rub his belly all the time.

We got him updated on all his shots and his surgery is taken care of. Also, since he’s technically custody of the Sanctuary, all of his vet bills for his entire life would be covered by us. Like all the farm animals we adopt out, we have an open door policy. We agree to pay for his lifetime care, and take him back at any time without question if it doesn’t work out.

We named him Party. He already loves you.

Mohammed Mo’ Problems

•October 24, 2008 • 2 Comments

I wish to apologize. I’m sorry cats. I’m sorry muslims. I’m sorry to everyone who has been killed by a suicide bomber. I’m sorry to anyone who knows someone who was killed by a suicide bomber. I’m sorry Halloween. I’m sorry Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Israel, and Syria. I’m sorry to all the countries I didn’t list. I’m sorry humans. I’m sorry that this is so offensive. I’m sorry I find it so hilarious. I’m just so sorry.

I also wish it to be known that this is not my cat and I am not responsible for this. But someone out there is…

SUNY Social Justice Conference 2008

•October 20, 2008 • Leave a Comment

Dear Friends,
On Saturday, November 8th I will be co-facilitating a workshop with the very special Jasmin Singer at the first annual SUNY Social Justice Conference in Binghamton, New York.

Our workshop will discuss the intersections of oppression. We will specifically focus on how discrimination against women, homosexuals, people of color, and the poor is inextricably linked to human discrimination against animals. We will discuss the similarities in tactic, strategy, philosophy, and media that have been used to oppress each of these groups throughout history, and why we must address each of them if we are going to achieve meaningful progress for any of them.

If you would like to attend, the conference information can be found here. The food for the weekend will be provided by the Binghamton chapter of Food Not Bombs, and the keynote speaker is Howard Zinn. You may have heard of him.

I will post the outline here once it’s finished. I may even turn the outline into a brief paper and just post that for anyone interested in reading it.

This is a small conference being held by a very dedicated group of students. I would love to be able to get them as much support as possible.

Maverick Family to McCain – “Go to Hell”

•October 9, 2008 • Leave a Comment

Ahh, sometimes it feels really, really good to unabashedly revel in the complete unravelling of another person. A recent New York Times article has brought to light a story that indulges in that completely juvenile impulse we all have to push our enemies in the mud and laugh. Oh, how we’ll laugh.

It appears that the Maverick family, a brood whose political geneology is traceable back to the 1600’s, would like John McCain and Sarah Palin to please stop using the family’s last name in their campaign for the White House.

The term Maverick came about in the 1800’s when Samual Augustus Maverick began cattle ranching in Texas, and was the only rancher at the time not to brand his cattle. “He was more interested in keeping track of the land he owned than the livestock on it, Ms. Maverick said; unbranded cattle, then, were called ‘Maverick’s.’”

The term jumped from literal to figurative as the Maverick family progressed in politics and became know for their staunch opposition to the federal government, and spent much of their political power defending “draft resisters, athiests, and others scorned by society”

The Maverick’s have been “firebrand libertarians” for much of their recent history.

The New York Times article is very brief, and explains much of what I just did. It ends with this lovely set of phrases:

“Considering the family’s long history of association with liberalism and progressive ideals, it should come as no surprise that Ms. Maverick insists that John McCain, who has voted so often with his party, “is in no way a maverick, in uppercase or lowercase.’

It’s just incredible — the nerve! — to suggest that he’s not part of that Republican herd. Every time we hear it, all my children and I and all my family shrink a little and say, ‘Oh, my God, he said it again.’

‘He’s a Republican,’ she said. ‘He’s branded.’

Fool me once, shame on you…

•October 4, 2008 • Leave a Comment

LAS VEGAS (Reuters) – O.J. Simpson, the former football star who was famously cleared of double murder in the sensational 1990s “Trial of the Century,” was found guilty on all charges in his Las Vegas kidnapping and robbery case on Friday.

Word Up Wednesday Volume 4 – The Deele

•October 1, 2008 • 3 Comments

Like most of our Word Up Wednesday artists, The Deele are in a class of bands that you don’t know you have ever heard until you accidentally discover them in the free bin of a book store basement and are hit with a tidal wave of recognition from samples and techniques that resound through today’s popular music.

The Deele are the first musical group to bring together R&B powerhouses Kenneth “Babyface” Edmonds, and Antonio “LA” Reid who would both eventually leave the group to start LaFace Records which is responsible for releasing some of the most seminal R&B music of the 90’s.

From 1981 through 1988, The Deele’s original line-up released albums regularly under the SOLAR record label which was the pet project of Dick Griffey, founder of Soul Train Records and Don Cornellius, host of the eponymous Soul Train television show.

SOLAR is also responsible for launching the careers of genre defining artists of the period including Shalamar, Dynasty, Klymaxx, the Whispers, Lakeside, Midnight Star and Calloway.

The first single by the group was 1981’s “Body Talk” and was characterized by heavy synthesizer pumps, a killer bass groove, and a lyrical meter that more than closely resembled another synthesizer heavy funk hit – “The Walk” by Minneapolis based The Time. “Body Talk” so deftly mimics “The Walk” that The Deele go so far as to reference the latter in the opening stanza of the former:

Just because I shake and party
And roll my sexy body
Dont mean that I’m tryin to tease
Its called body talk
Its not like the walk
cause this time
You’re wearin blue jeans

Which is a thinly veiled slight targeted toward “The Walk” which employs blue jeans as the subject of a running joke throughout the song. Beginning with this phrase:

The days of dancing in one place are gone.
And honey, you know you can’t dance with them tight jeans on.
If you try to cop a dip, you trip, slip, and fall.
Walking’s for the cool baby, put on a camisole.

The comparisons don’t end there. Beyond the dual imperatives to either “talk your body” or “walk your body” respectively, both tracks bring together multiple genres of music that became the massive, chart topping, hit machine, super-genre known as Electro Funk. The involved genres include (but are not limited to) Funk, R&B, Soul, Electronic, Synth Pop, Jazz, Hip Hop, and the very first inklings of New Jack Swing.

Although “Body Talk” is arguably more aggressive in its meter, instrumentation, and production techniques (read: less subtle) than “The Walk”, the similarities definitely tread water in the ever tenuous musical Bermuda Triangle where the rivers of tribute, satire, and plagiarism combine.

Despite this potential embarassment, the success of “Body Talk” was instantaneous, and led the group to create several more chart toppers throughout the decade including “Video Villain”, “Hip Chick”, “Shoot em up Movies” and “Two Occasions”, the last of which would go on to be noticeably sampled in Mariah Carey’s 2007 come-back anthem “We Belong Together.”

Although there are many more things to be said about The Deele, the music, as always, speaks for itself. They pumped out the jams.

Download: The Deele – Body Talk (zShare)
Download: The Deele – Hip Chick (zShare)
Download: The Deele – Video Villain (zShare)
Download: The Deele – Two Occasions (zShare)
Download: The Time – The Walk (zShare)

Really? Ecuador??

•September 29, 2008 • Leave a Comment

Last week, I had a conversation with a close family member about why I don’t vote. I explained that until someone of any party recognized the rights of the natural world instead of continuing to protect our interest in exploiting it, I would not vote. I explained that I don’t care about protecting jobs if the jobs we’re protecting are responsible for global destruction and untold amounts of suffering.

I was fired up.

Well, it seems that all I might have to do to make our whole conversation moot is move my ass to everyone’s favorite budding democracy – Ecuador.

As some of you may know, Ecuador has been involved in severe legal battles with many corporations over the damaging of its ecosystems (the Galapagos aren’t going to exploit themselves!) and have lost patience with the protection afforded by most environmental standards in place.

The solution? Ecuador has taken it upon itself to design a constitution wherein nature is granted inalienable rights, and will receive legal protection under the law as any Ecuadorian citizen would.

Seriously??? Seriously.

What this actually means is that air, water, rivers, islands, trees – would all achieve a legal standing that would allow citizens of Ecuador to sue a person or corporation on behalf of an ecosystem.

This article from the Guardian describes it much better than I can.
Here’s an excerpt:

Thomas Linzey, a US lawyer who has helped to develop the new legal framework for nature, says: “The dominant form of environmental protection in industrialised countries is based on the regulatory system. Governments permit and legalise the discharge of certain amounts of toxics into the environment. As a form of environmental protection, it’s not working.

“In the same way, compensation is measured in terms of that injury to a person or people. Under the new system, it will be measured according to damage to the ecosystem. The new system is, in essence, an attempt to codify sustainable development. The new laws would grant people the right to sue on behalf of an ecosystem, even if not actually injured themselves.”

Until now, all legal frameworks have been anthropocentric, or people-based. To file an environmental lawsuit requires a person to provide evidence of personal injury. This can be extremely difficult. To provide a conclusive link, say, between a cancer and polluted drinking water is, legally speaking, virtually impossible.

The origins of this apparent legal tidal shift lie in Ecuador’s growing disillusionment with foreign multinationals. The country, which contains every South American ecosystem within its borders, which include the Galapagos Islands, has had disastrous collisions with multi-national companies. Many, from banana companies to natural gas extractors, have exploited its natural resources and left little but pollution and poverty in their wake.

I am almost waiting for the punchline. I am still extremely skeptical of governmental regulation of this sort (The ACLU hasn’t exactly run out of law suits even though we’re all supposed to have rights). However, if this constitution passes it will be the first ever of its kind in the world, and who knows what might come next after this legal precedent has been established.

In order to obtain another opinion, I sent a quick note to activist Derrick Jensen, author of several books including The Culture of Make Believe and Endgame Volumes I and II soliciting his thoughts on the issue. Here is the response I received.

“I think it’s something that will actually help. Of course it won’t solve anything, since industrial civilization creates insoluble problems. But it’s good, I think.”

That pretty much sums it up.

Word Up Wednesday Volume 3 – Zapp and Roger

•September 23, 2008 • 3 Comments

I have severely neglected my duties as the arbiter of Word Up Wednesday, and for that, I apologize. I have made it up to you by choosing to highlight one of the most influential funk quintets of all time, Zapp and Roger, also known as the Zapp Band.

Formed in 1978 by a brood of five brothers belonging to the Troutman family, Roger, Larry, Lester, Tony, and Terry (Zapp), reached astronomical success as the mainstrem ushers of legendary musical technology – the Talk Box (not to be confused with the Vocoder).

Their first two albums, simply titled Zapp and Zapp II were released in 1980 and 1982 respectively, and contain the brothers’ most famous hits including “More Bounce to the Ounce,” “Do it Roger,” “Computer Love,” and “Dance Floor”. Each song stands as its own unique tribute to a host of funk legends including George Clinton, Bootsy Collins, James Brown and the Bar Kays, while still allowing the band to develop their unique sound which would come to define the course of funk and pop music from the 80’s forward.

Zapp and Roger songs have been sampled heavily throughout pop music, specifically in the realm of popular hip-hop. They are credited with laying the foundation for a style of hip-hop known as G Funk and their songs have been sampled for use in songs by dozens of artists, including EPMD, Dr. Dre, Snoop Dogg, and Tupac, as well as more recently in the work of electro-pop titans, Chromeo

American Weekends has been deeply affected by Zapp and Roger, and will remain forever grateful for their creation of, and influence on, some of the funkiest and most danceable music of all time.

Download Zapp and Roger: More Bounce the the Ounce (zShare)
Download Zapp and Roger: So Ruff, So Tuff (zShare)
Download Zapp and Roger: Do it Roger (zShare)
Download Zapp and Roger: Dance Floor (zShare)